Justices dubious about forcing actuaries to use out-of-date assumptions in assessing costs of leaving a multiemployer pension plan

Tuesday’s argument in M&K Employee Solutions v Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund showed a bench skeptical of forcing actuaries to use out-of-date assumptions when they work on pension plans. The case involves a particular type of pension arrangement in which a group of employers in the same industry […]

Read More

The full Fed battle

It is a crisply cold winter morning in Washington as people filed into the Supreme Court for Trump v. Cook, about President Donald Trump’s effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. It is warm in the courtroom, though, and by the time reporters are escorted upstairs, some notable guests […]

Read More

Saints, statues, and church-state separation

Rights and Responsibilities is a recurring series by Richard Garnett on legal education, the role of the courts in our constitutional structure, and the law of religious freedom and free expression. I have observed that, when it comes to religious freedom and church-state relations – and contrary to some commentators’ complaints […]

Read More

SCOTUStoday for Thursday, January 22

We’re on the precipice of the Supreme Court’s four-week winter recess. Only time will tell if the next month will be a quiet one or if we’ll get additional rulings. Plus, a reminder: we’re hiring! We’re looking for an editor to oversee a new daily newsletter for commercial litigators and […]

Read More

The relist logjam finally breaks

The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. On Friday, the Supreme Court granted what may be its last grants of the October 2025-26 term. All of them were one-time relists: Monsanto Co. v. […]

Read More

Four answers to the justices in Wolford v. Lopez

Brothers in Law is a recurring series by brothers Akhil and Vikram Amar, with special emphasis on measuring what the Supreme Court says against what the Constitution itself says. For more content from Akhil and Vikram, please see Akhil’s free weekly podcast, “Amarica’s Constitution,” Vikram’s regular columns on Justia, and Akhil’s new book, Born Equal: […]

Read More

California Republicans urge Supreme Court to strike congressional map as racially discriminatory

In December, the Supreme Court allowed Texas to use a new congressional map enacted to give Republicans five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, blocking a lower court’s ruling that the map unconstitutionally sorted voters based on race. On Tuesday night, Republicans came to the Supreme Court, asking […]

Read More